Cunningham Swaim, LLP - Business

CONTACT US
DALLAS: 214-646-1495 | PASADENA: 626-765-3000 | DENVER: | PAGOSA SPRINGS: 970-884-3511 | HOUSTON: 713-668-0610 | NEW YORK: 917-538-2774

CONTACT US
DALLAS: 214-646-1495
PASADENA: 626-765-3000
DENVER: 303-309-8167
PAGOSA SPRINGS: 970-884-3511
HOUSTON: 713-668-0610
NEW YORK: 917-538-2774

DALLAS OFFICE

4015 Main Street
Suite 200
Dallas, TX 75226

214-646-1495

PASADENA OFFICE

2 N. Lake Avenue
Suite 550
Pasadena, CA 91101

626-765-3000

PAGOSA SPRINGS OFFICE

2800 Cornerstone Dr.
Building B, Suite 201
Pagosa Springs, CO 81147

970-884-3511

HOUSTON OFFICE

2929 Allen Parkway
Suite 1520
Houston, TX 77019

713-668-0610

NEW YORK OFFICE

200 Broadhollow Road
Suite 207
Melville, NY 11747

917-538-2774
Focused Trial Lawyers In Dallas, Texas, Pasadena, California And Denver, Colorado
Best practices to resolve business deadlocks without litigation

Best practices to resolve business deadlocks without litigation

On Behalf of | Sep 10, 2024 | Business Litigation |

Deadlocks in closely held corporations can create significant challenges. This process is especially difficult when key stakeholders disagree on critical decisions. While litigation is one way to resolve these disputes, it can be costly and time-consuming. 

However, there are strategies that can help resolve deadlocks without turning to the courts. Understanding these best practices is essential for solving these issues equitably.

Establishing clear decision-making procedures

One of the most effective ways to prevent or resolve deadlocks is by having well-defined decision-making procedures in place. These should be in the corporation’s bylaws or shareholder agreements. These decision-making procedures should address how to handle disputes before they escalate.

Implementing tie-breaking mechanisms, such as designating a neutral third party to cast a deciding vote, can help break deadlocks. In some cases, weighted voting can help. Granting certain stakeholders more voting power can often prevent deadlocks. This is particularly useful when one individual holds a majority of shares or has a key role.

Mediation and arbitration

Mediation and arbitration offer non-litigious ways to resolve disputes in closely held corporations. Both methods provide a neutral forum for discussing issues. This allows parties to reach an agreement without involving the court system. In arbitration, a neutral arbitrator listens to both sides and makes a binding decision. This provides a quicker resolution than litigation.

Buy-sell agreements

A buy-sell agreement can also help resolve deadlocks. This agreement allows one party to buy out the other in the event of an impasse. This type of agreement, set up in advance, outlines the conditions under which a shareholder can sell their shares. It also establishes a process for determining the value of those shares. This ensures that the buyout process is fair and transparent.

Building a foundation for long-term success

In business litigation, resolving deadlocks in closely held corporations requires more than just a quick fix. It involves creating a foundation for long-term success. It also fosters a healthier corporate environment that can withstand future disagreements.

FindLaw Network