Cunningham Swaim, LLP - Business

CONTACT US
DALLAS: 214-646-1495 | PASADENA: 626-765-3000 | DENVER: | PAGOSA SPRINGS: 970-884-3511 | HOUSTON: 713-668-0610 | NEW YORK: 917-538-2774

CONTACT US
DALLAS: 214-646-1495
PASADENA: 626-765-3000
DENVER: 303-309-8167
PAGOSA SPRINGS: 970-884-3511
HOUSTON: 713-668-0610
NEW YORK: 917-538-2774

DALLAS OFFICE

4015 Main Street
Suite 200
Dallas, TX 75226

214-646-1495

PASADENA OFFICE

2 N. Lake Avenue
Suite 550
Pasadena, CA 91101

626-765-3000

PAGOSA SPRINGS OFFICE

2800 Cornerstone Dr.
Building B, Suite 201
Pagosa Springs, CO 81147

970-884-3511

HOUSTON OFFICE

2929 Allen Parkway
Suite 1520
Houston, TX 77019

713-668-0610

NEW YORK OFFICE

200 Broadhollow Road
Suite 207
Melville, NY 11747

917-538-2774
Focused Trial Lawyers In Dallas, Texas, Pasadena, California And Denver, Colorado
3 risks airlines shouldn’t take while hiring pilots

3 risks airlines shouldn’t take while hiring pilots

On Behalf of | Aug 20, 2026 | Aviation Law |

The stakes are exceptionally high in the aviation industry. There is truly no room for error, especially when hiring pilots. Airlines face the risk of direct negligence claims if bad hiring practices lead to accidents. 

Inadequate background screening  

Airlines have to check a pilot’s background before letting them fly. By law, it is mandatory for them to verify the candidate’s qualifications and disciplinary history through the Pilot Records Database (PRD). They should also make sure that the candidate passes the Federal Aviation Administration’s drug and alcohol tests. This step helps the airlines to identify the candidate’s prior substance-related offenses.  

Lowering application standards

When facing applicant shortages, some airlines may try to lower their internal hiring standards. While this doesn’t necessarily violate any aviation law, they should make sure they are not below the standards set by the FAA. Airlines should bridge any gap in skill or experience with extra training. This ensures that only qualified candidates make it to the cockpit. 

Using unvalidated or outdated selection systems

Simple interviews and basic written tests are not enough. Federal rules require proven, structured testing that predicts how a pilot acts during a real flight crisis. Retaining poor trainees or using weak testing tools creates major legal risks. If an accident happens because of human error, the airline could be held legally responsible.

How a legal guide may help

Airlines can avoid huge liabilities by screening thoroughly, updating training and using proven tests. Yet, many hidden legal traps still exist. Partnering with a skilled aviation attorney gives airlines the tools they need to stay safe and compliant.

Archives

FindLaw Network